Thursday, February 24, 2022

NEW MODULE Artist Statements: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

 


Most artists despise writing artist statements. Why? The answer is quite simple: They feel that their work speaks for itself and that attaching language to it indicates a sense of weakness, even betrayal. We have all read artist statements that take cringe to the next level. Here's Charlotte Young making fun of horrible and cliched artist statements. As we see with Calvin in the cartoon strip above, it's an easy target for ridicule. 

However, it's kind of like death and taxes: You can't opt out. If you want to be a successful artist or designer, you're going to need to articulate in written language what makes your work special and unique. You're also going to have to learn how to use spoken language to represent your art, but that's not the same as a formal artist statement. The term "artists statement" is relatively new; it doesn't appear in print before 1960.




Writing a good artist statement is hard. That's another reason people don't like writing them. One common misconception is that artists write one statement, and they use that same statement for every purpose.  Nope. Artists need to write new statements for new bodies of work. You can have a template that you modify as circumstances necessitate. That's smart and labor-saving. 

Your assignment for next Tuesday's class, March 1, is to upload a finished draft of a new artist statement. It needs to be around 250 words. This is the "Goldilocks" zone: If it's much shorter it will seem like you didn't try or care (the "refusal" approach"), and if it's much longer it will seem self-important and pompous. If you're a little under or a little over, that's OK. If you want guidance as to what I mean by "a little", please let me know.

Read these three articles from Hyperallergic. Which do you agree with and why? We'll discuss these issues on Tuesday and also share some of our drafts. This link will take you to the best critical writing on the subject that I have found. Good students will love it; bad students will find it tedious. 

Draft due no later than 1:00 pm on Tuesday, March 1. 
Final due no later than 1:00 pm on Thursday, March 3.
Upload to Populi.

Each part is worth 5 points. Don't blow off the draft. 

Here are some examples of what not to do. I call it "Eight Artist Statements that I Hate." They are too short, too whimsical, and too amateurish. And here are more examples, some better than others. 

Questions?  csmith@dcad.edu






Tuesday, February 22, 2022

One Polished Paragraph

Today in class we'll be practicing the art of integrating secondary sources into your writing using MLA parenthetical format.

Here is a link to recent award-winning papers written by undergraduates, just like you.  

Each student will have 45 minutes to write, revise, edit, and upload one paragraph that demonstrates the effective integration of a predetermined secondary source available on JSTOR in MLA format:


Directions:

1) Find the essay on JSTOR. Easy, right?

2) Read the essay and transcribe three excerpts that you might use in your paragraph. You can cut-n-paste these excerpts or write them by hand. Do not forget the page number, you will need that information.

3) The topic of your paragraph is simple: Do you agree or not agree with Michael Greer's ideas? Do you agree or disagree in certain ways but not others? Why or why not?

4) Draft a paragraph that has at least 6 and no more than 10 sentences.

5) The third or fourth sentence must introduce the verbatim (Latin for exactly) quotation from Greer's essay with a signal phrase and be punctuated according to MLA parenthetical format (see link here).

6) The end of the paragraph (at least two or three additional sentences after the quotation) should be your voice's contribution to the discussion. Avoid the first-person voice: no I, me, my, etc. 

7) Proofread carefully. Proofread again. If you have a question, ask. 

8) Use the JSTOR citation generator to find the correct MLA citation for Greer's essay. Fix the hanging indents, fix the capitalization, and center the words "Work Cited" above the citation. Place this under your paragraph.

9) Proofread everything one last time.

10) Upload to our Populi discussion board. 
 

 

Thursday, February 17, 2022

I Hate the "Evidence Sandwich" and the "Essay Hamburger"

 








Three Cheers for Scholarly Secondary Sources!

 


This video breaks down the differences between popular and scholarly sources. Please keep in mind that popular sources aren't always "bad" and scholarly sources aren't necessarily "good". Like with most things in life, it's the context that matters. 

In this mini-unit, we will be learning how to effectively and correctly boost our critical writing with the use of scholarly sources. In particular, we will be using the JSTOR database and the much-loved format known as MLA.

Aaron Swartz, JSTOR, and Freedom of Information

You might never have heard the name, Aaron Swartz. If so, that's about to change. He hacked the computer system at MIT to download thousands of articles on the paysite JSTOR with the intention of releasing them free to the public. A massive and very controversial court case followed. You can watch a feature-length documentary about the story on YouTube. Today in class we're going to watch this short video.

Was he right? Was he wrong? Both? Neither?

 

Thursday, February 10, 2022

Advice for Writing Art Criticism: Written by an Undergraduate

 


This is great advice. 

Always remember the audience. You are not writing into a void.




And here is another piece, also written by an undergraduate, that discusses subjectivity in art reviewing.


Tuesday, February 8, 2022

Breaking News: Extension Granted for Online Exhibition Review!

We need more time for this assignment. The new due date is Tuesday, February 15. No late papers.

Bring a paper copy of your finished draft to class this Thursday.  

Basic 10-Point Rubric

 


I've uploaded this rubric to the "Files" tab of our Populi course page. For the most part, it's self-explanatory. I also use half-points. Please talk to me at any time if you would like clarity on your grade(s) or would like to appeal for a higher score. I'll listen and give you my honest response: csmith@dcad.edu

Here is the 10-point grading scale in condensed form:

11/10: Professional (rare)

10/10: Exemplary in every respect, high "A"

9.5/10: Excellent achievement, solid "A"

9/10: Very good, slight problems here and there, solid "B+/A-"

8.5/10: Gets all the basics right but problems creep in, "B"

8/10: OK, but shows signs of carelessness or rush job, "C+/B-"

7.5/10: Poor organization, going through the motions, "C"

7/10: Careless in most respects, doesn't follow basics, "D+/C-"

If your assignment is lower than a 7/10, you'll need to meet with me and make a plan for resubmission.

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

My Attempt at Bad Art Writing

 I cobbled this together years ago in an effort to write the worst artist's statement in world history. I don't know if I succeeded, but I do know that it's really, really, really bad. A gallerist friend in DC sent me a copy of a terrible press release and that text is in the background of this one. I added to its horror.  -- Casey


Artist’s Statement

I decided to walk a path without compromises, a stormy road, the road of the tragedy’s formalisation. My work faces an experience free of any religious or mystical conditioning. A man who doesn’t experience eroticism to the limits of the possible is alienated; such a man has never known my inner experience. I look for the being who is beyond self in desire, in heartbreaking passion as far as the extreme limits where voluptuousness and disgust meet and cancel each other out; I use my skill as a provocative instrument, an act of indispensable violence with the purpose of giving to art a collocation that can represent a silent sinking of a man at his life’s peak. This is the driving force for me: running through the forbidden kingdom of eroticism where the youthful obsessions and the Freudian dream, the thirst for male revenge and the disgust for saturation meet. Inside me there are unmistakable surrealist influences, like an inclination for mental associations or for parallel (but perfectly plausible) worlds, but the most powerful weapon is my anger. In my opinion the representation of a nude is not an aesthetic opportunity and a sensual or erotic form is not addressed only to educated, fragile people. Eroticism must have a social connotation. Against the stupidity of our days, against the offence of rationality, according to me, art can express a force that must not be undervalued, provided that it is turned into an action by an iron will and by a skilled hand. Through the way of degradation that I walk you can reach the beauty of obscenity and cruelty. Along the desire borders, the kingdom of horror begins and ecstasy can spring from it. This is the logic that annexes art when the game of love and pleasure bore. You can interpret my naked bodies in this sense, such as if they were hung down butcher’s hooks. This is the undeniable world of void, the world of break up, form it derives the macabre pleasure of the policeman Bertrand, Jack the Ripper’s morbid surgery, Landru’s cremated bodies. It is a guided, declaimed horror that becomes attached to the body object and that now is at the image disposal. Love gets closer to death in a road freckled of attempts, the way to initiation, but in the end you do not reach the promised garden of delight nor do you discover the treasure of the legend but the frightening abyss of nothing. This obscene beauty, this pain’s orgasm, lighted also by the light of despair, is expressed in the macabre representations and must be interpreted as a figurative answer, a pictorial nemesis of the suffered violence. At that time, and today, a spectator, a voyeur, who only desires to be hit, observes secretly the scene. It is obvious that for Del Piombo, Holbein, Michelangelo, Correggio, Artemisia, Munch, Bellmer, Bacon or me, eros and thanatos are just one thing.

I was born in Pasadena in 1965. I now live in Washington, DC, where my atelier is established. In my youth, I began to paint reproducing the masters in an instinctive journey of research and acquaintance through the several passages of the history of expressive art, as if my personal psychology and nature dictated the road that I would then have to cover in the future. During this journey I matured a deep knowledge of great valence, not only representative or figurative, that the artistic expression has on the human being, and this has lead me through various fields of research that cross different art forms. In this continuous study and in-depth investigation the natural artistic evolution and the choice of the techniques lead me to privilege painting in acrylic, oil, and watercolour. But the always curious spirit of expressive alternatives and striving for learning new artistic communication forms, that always subtends to any choice I make and that expresses the versatility of my personality, takes me to approach and to experience other aspects of art as creations with words, clay, wood, ceramics, and artistic installations. From the sum of all these aspects of my personality and experiences, I therefore gain the instinctive ability to render life, the human society and beings and to create works that express my vision and look on the world in a straight way, emotionally strong, sometimes in a raw and realistic way, sometimes in a dream-like way, other times in a nearly disarming way for the simplicity with which I succeed in expressing my emotions. The theme that I prefer to face and to express in my work is that of the decadence of the western human being and societies and models, addicted to the spasmodic research and exploitation of appearance, of  individual profit as the only value to pursue, hardly lost in the mazes of a nihilistic and exclusively self-referring psychosis, and by now incapable of arising again to themselves and to the world with that creative, positive and renovating force that should characterize actions, thoughts and evolution of human beings. It’s the metaphysical vision, sad nevertheless strong and determined, of these aspects of reality and of these contrasts not only social and political, but also strongly emotional and psychological, the creative field in which my work in is born. The study and the research of new materials, expressive forms, new levels of sensibility and thought always continues and will always be the base of every work and job of the artist. Restless and strong, since adolescence the possibility to express myself through art, with my pictures, without any indulgence or rhetoric, has been my sole goal. I want to explore the intimacy not resolved which lodges in everyone of us and to point out the degeneration that modern society is suffering. On my canvas you find represented extreme situations, to the limit of what could be defined “forbidden”, exposed with sharp language, thus like the clearness and the accuracy of the details are the syntax chosen by me in order to arrive to an opened and clear exploration of the deformation of the human being. The repudiation of nature itself of the human being is exactly the fulcrum of the metaphoric speech of the artist that describes the individual as an entity that should distinguish himself for intellect and sensibility, reduced instead to hybrid, between man and beast, destined to an eternal dissatisfaction and vanity. The victim and the predator, wolf and lamb, do not show themselves like undistinguished personages that may be recognized for their identity, but hidden under a veil of uncertainty and animated by the controversial strength of the surrealistic reality in which they entered, they find themselves to feature confused roles, as actors who carry the spectator to doubt every appearing truth. The research of “The Ego” taken by the artist has the scope to find again those human qualities and those lost feelings, leaving from the often alarming representation that the mind dictates: love, physical attraction, vendetta, mercy, ambition, abjection, indifference are strictly connected and often difficult to distinguish, because multiple sides, overlapped, of a unique world. The truth becomes therefore interpretable in as many ways, a relative truth that does not follow any moral. Here, therefore, is revealed the objective of the artist: the difficult denunciation of the daily actuality of the perverted, the unsolved way towards a socially shared distinction between good and evil and, above all, the research of an absolute justice, not only looking as good, neither indulgent, but that coincide with the good… good represented through an extraordinary vision set free from every moralistic infrastructure.

Casey Smith

 

Intentionally Bad Art Writing Is Fun, but Great Writing is Inspiring: Introducing John Yau

 


John Yau might be my favorite art critic and reviewer writing today, but since I don't really rank art critics, I should probably just say that I think his writing is excellent. He never falls prey to the temptation of overstatement or the pretentiousness of International Art English. He now writes for Hyperallergic, which is today the leading art blog in America. 

Want to learn more? Here's a recent two-hour interview with him talking about the state of art writing today. 

Short Essay #2: Menu of Online Art Exhibitions

Spend an hour or two exploring these online exhibitions. Let me know if the links don't work. This is part of your homework. Enjoy learning about new artists and designers. Take notes about certain features of particular online exhibitions that are pleasing, distracting, smart, stupid, etc. 


Choose one of the following 13 (a baker's dozen!) online art exhibitions to review. Write a brief paragraph (3-5 sentences) about why you chose it. Be specific. Bring this paragraph to class on Thursday, February 3. The draft of your review will be due on Tuesday, February 8, no later than 1:00 pm. The final will be due on Thursday, February 10, no later than 1:00 pm.  

We will talk at length about the actual assignment during class on Thursday, February 3. For those of you looking to get started early, look at the new scans of the start of Sylvan Barnet's chapter in A Short Guide to Writing About Art about writing art reviews. However, he doesn't take into account the differences between writing about an in-person experience and an online experience. This scan is located in the Files tab on our Populi course page. 

Questions: csmith@dcad.edu


1. Hung Liu: Portraits of Promised Lands, 1968-2020

https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/hung-liu-portraits-promised-lands-1968-2020:event-exhib-6513


2. Printing the Revolution! The Rise and Impact of Chicano Graphics, 1965 to Now

https://americanart.si.edu/exhibitions/chicano-graphics?utm_source=si.edu&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=exhibitions


3. Willi Smith: Street Couture

https://willismitharchive.cargo.site/

4. John Singer Sargent: Portraits in Charcoal

https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/john-singer-sargent-portraits-charcoal:event-exhib-6291

 

5. James Van Der Zee’s Photographs: A Portrait of Harlem

https://www.nga.gov/exhibitions/2021/james-van-der-zee-photographs-portrait-harlem.html

 

6. Artist Projects: Sarah Cain, Avish Khebrehzadeh, Kay Rosen

https://www.nga.gov/exhibitions/2021/artist-projects-sarah-cain-avish-khebrehzadeh-kay-rosen.html

 

7. Inspiring Walt Disney: The Animation of French Decorative Arts

https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2021/inspiring-walt-disney

 

8. Charles Ray: Figure Ground

https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2021/charles-ray

 

9. Jasper Johns: Mind/Mirror (two venues)

Whitney Museum of American Art: 

https://whitney.org/exhibitions/jasper-johns?gclid=Cj0KCQiA0eOPBhCGARIsAFIwTs727V_fX0B0KWWlXOBTs4ll31BtRYlW20WBaPOTncH2YE1oFASlZtkaAkTHEALw_wcB

Philadelphia Museum of Art:  

https://philamuseum.org/calendar/exhibition/jasper-johns-mindmirror

 

10. Celebrating 150 Years of “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland”

https://exhibitions.lib.umd.edu/alice150

 

11. Viral Self-Portraits (group exhibition)

https://www.mg-lj.si/en/online-exhibitions/2888/viral-portraits/

 

12. Lorna Simpson: Give Me Some Moments

https://www.vip-hauserwirth.com/online-exhibitions/lorna-simpson-give-me-some-moments/

 

13. Mary Ellen Mark: Girlhood

https://nmwa.org/whats-on/exhibitions/online/mary-ellen-mark-girlhood/

 


FAQ: The Academic Essay

I've been teaching college writing for a very long time, and through these years I've noticed certain enduring issues that students ...