Sunday, February 28, 2021

Al-Mutanabbi St Starts Here: Zoom Poetry Reading this Friday from 6:00-7:30

  



You are invited to a reading this upcoming Friday night from 6:00 to 7:30. This webpage from the Smithsonian gives a great overview of the project. 

The al-Mutanabbi St. Starts Here Coalition has been organizing readings, exhibitions, lectures, and concerts around the world since 2007. The first reading I organized was back in 2009. The video from that reading is still one of the best. 

We will keep the conference open for the final 30 minutes for those who want to continue the discussion and ask questions of the participating writers and artists. 

If you show up and write me a brief reply in an email about your thoughts and experiences, I'll award you an extra-credit point. Fun, right?

I'll send you the Zoom link via your DCAD email account. 

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Los Angeles Art College Students Making Zines

 




Today in class we're going to spend the bulk of our time in breakout rooms, which will give each student an opportunity to talk about their zine and get ideas from classmates about how to improve it. Each student should have at least 10 minutes to focus on their zine. For the final 15 minutes of class, we'll come back together and talk about what we experienced in the break-out rooms. 

For your critique in the breakout rooms, consider the following:

Concept: What is the intention behind the zine? What ideas does it feature? Are they obvious and generic or specific and detailed?

Audience:  Who is this book's ideal reader? Is this clearly conveyed in the writing and art? 

Writing: How does your writing communicate your ideas? Is it precisely the way you want it? You might not want standard grammar and punctuation, but if that's the case, there should be a reason for it. 

Art:  How do your images communicate your ideas? 

Writing & Art:  This is frequently called the text/image relationship. How does your writing work with your images? Does one take a dominant role? If yes, why?

Layout & Execution:  How does it look? Are the margins crowded? Is anything illegible? Does the handwriting look haphazard or childish? Was a dreadful font chosen? Are there too many competing fonts? Does it have an even number of pages?

Technical Problems with Digital Matters: Help each other out with this. It truly can be confusing. 

Take-Away: How does the zine make you think and feel about the central concept? Did it give you a new way of thinking and feeling about the central concept?

Other Things: You might have other comments or ideas to share with your classmates that don't easily fit into the categories above. Trust yourself and go right ahead.


Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Issuu Technical Guidelines

 


Click here for information about technical specifications for file preparation for Issuu uploads.

Verbal Description of Your Zine

 What is your zine about? Why did you choose this subject? What is the relationship between words and images? What is your vision for your zine? Write a single paragraph that addresses these questions (and other relevant ones).

Cut and paste this paragraph and put it into the discussion board on our Populi page. You have twenty minutes. 

Today: Mandatory Information Session on FIRST-YEAR PORTFOLIO

 

Today! 12:45-1:45



Thursday, February 18, 2021

Zine Project! (updated)


As promised, we're shifitng assignments in the syllabus. Instead of doing the "Cover Letter and Resume" unit, we're doing the creative Zine project.

This page gives a solid introduction to the concept of zines and why people create them. This page is also good. Explore and learn more.

Because of the limitations imposed by our Covid lives, we are going to make digital zines this semester. Your zine should be at least 8 pages. If it's more, it must be an even number. Your zine will have a front cover and a back cover, and at least three spreads. If you want to keep going, I'm not going to stop you.

This is important. Your file should be a PDF and each "page of your book" should be a separate page of your PDF document. 

Your homework for next Tuesday, February 23 is to have a concept for your zine and preliminary pages laid out (a draft). Upload to Populi.

The final version is due on Tuesday, March 2, no later than 9:00 am.

Questions: csmith@dcad.edu

 

Link for Video of Alexa Smith's Visiting Artist Talk

 A handful of students couldn't make it on Tuesday because of work and other commitments. Here's a link to the talk.

Monday, February 15, 2021

"Writing for the Arts" sections tomorrow have been shifted & Awesomesauce review is due no later than 9:00 am

Reminder: Our class is not meeting at the regular time tomorrow. Instead, we're hearing a visiting artist, Alexa Smith, during Common Hour. Join the Zoom conference a few minutes before we start at 12:45. Here's all the information that you'll need:


 Visiting Artist Talk: Alexa Smith

2/16 at 12:45 PM

Join us as we have a Q&A with Alexa Smith! She's the poetry editor of Philly's Apiary. Alexa Smith is a poet and performer from Washington D.C. She lives in South Philly, attends and teaches for Temple University's MFA program by day, and manages Apiary's editorial process by night. You can find her writing online in Entropy, Interim, Peach Mag, Memoir Mixtapes, and Dark Wood. Alexa will be able to speak on the confluence of art and writing, especially in emerging spaces like DIY publishing and web-based presentation. You can find her bio by scrolling down a bit on this page. http://www.apiarymagazine.com/about-us

Join Zoom Meeting

Meeting ID: 970 7280 7193

Thursday, February 11, 2021

FINAL Awesomesauce Review Due Next Tuesday, February 16, no later than 9:00 am


 

Please note: Class next Tuesday has been shifted to 12:45-1:45 (Common Hour) so we can hear our visiting artist, Alexa Smith, speak about art and writing. If you cannot make this time-slot, let me know ASAP. I will send an email reminder.

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Awesomesauce Installation Shots

 


Check out the first two or three minutes of the Virtual Opening video to get a sense of the show in its physical (not virtual) space.

Group Work for February 9

 Group 1: Brunson

Group 2: Glover

Group 3: McCracken

Group 4: Cho

Group 5: Diaz/Hinson

DRAFT DUE THIS THURSDAY

 Remember to upload the draft of your Awesomesauce review to our Populi page no later than 9:00 am, February 11. This draft will not be perfect, and that's OK. However, it should be structurally complete. This means that it should have a clear introduction to the show itself. The body of your review should concern itself with describing, analyzing, and evaluating the actual work in the show. Your concluding paragraph should summarize your experience of the exhibition and offer an evaluation to your reader. 

You will "like" certain work more than others. And some of the work you might find baffling and difficult to understand. That's ok. Do your best. 

If I were to write this review, I would do it in seven paragraphs. The middle five would be shorter than the introductory and concluding paragraphs. I would give an individual paragraph to Brunson, Glover, McCracken, and Cho. I would write another short paragraph about Hinson and Diaz together.

There is not one correct way to write this essay. We will have a vigorous critique on Thursday. The aim is to improve the final product. Your final review of Awesomesauce is due no later than 9:00 am on Tuesday, February 16.

Questions:  csmith@dcad.edu

Check out ArtReview.com for examples of exhibition reviews

 


ArtReview.com is a great source for reviews about art. Most of the reviews are of actual art exhibitions (like Awesomesauce), but some are reviews of books and performances that center on art practices. You can learn a lot from studying examples that you personally like. 

Thursday, February 4, 2021

Graded Assignment Two: Review of "Awesomesauce"

 


DCAD is awesomely proud of our new exhibition of former students and the work they're making now. Six different artists and designers have made sculptural, internet, and video-based installations. Spend some time with the website. If possible, go to DCAD and experience the exhibition from the sidewalk. It was expressly "turned inside-out" so that people could experience the show without going inside the building. This was a necessity forced by Covid-19, but a great example of making lemonade from lemons. (Note: I don't know if I fully understand this proverb.) Check out the "About/Programs" tab on the main page. There you will find a link to the virtual opening (about an hour long) and links to the individual artist talks. The first one is scheduled for this Saturday. Students who attend these Zoom talks and ask at least one question will receive an extra-credit point. 

Let's stay with the single-spaced two-column format. Feel free to take screengrabs and incorporate them into your review essay (make sure to include the credit line with the work's maker, title, and year if it's provided). You will probably need the space of a second page to adequately review the show. 

Remember to assert your ideas about the exhibition and the individual works in it. This is crucial.

Reviews essentially all do the same three things: describe the work, analyze the work, and evaluate the work. You will want to do this with the individual artists as well as the greater exhibition itself. Read chapter 7 in Sylvan Barnet's A Short Guide to Writing About Art (154-169) to learn more about the basics of exhibition reviews.

Change:  The awesomeness website is currently down (Sunday, February 7, 7 pm). Therefore, we're moving the due date for your draft to this Thursday, February 11 (upload by 9:00 that morning) The final review essay will be due the following Tuesday, February 16. If the problem continues, we'll adjust the schedule again. 

If you have any questions, send me an email message: csmith@dcad.edu

Mel Bochner's "Language is not transparent" (1969)

 


Bochner's work of art is now more than 50 years old, but that doesn't stop critics and art writers from still writing about it today. Look carefully at how Katherine Kilalea writes about it. 

Thinking about Jasmine L Combs's poem "Object" reminded me of this series of work. Bochner made many different versions or ideations of this simple phrase. Even though the phrase is the same, the work itself isn't. Does this prove his point? Language can't be transparent; it has a body.




Check out this short time-lapse video of an installation of the piece above in 2014.



Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Uncreative Writing!

 Read this brief interview with Kenneth Goldsmith about his practice of Uncreative Writing and how he uses it in the teaching of his classes at UPenn. Goldsmith is perhaps most famous for his work as founder of ubu.com, a repository of all manner of avant-garde art and literature. 

Your (ungraded but required) assignment for Thursday is to type an exact transcription of Jasmine L. Combs' spoken-word poem "Object." The link is below in the post about our future collaboration with the Delaware Contemporary.

This exercise should probably take about 20-30 minutes. The best way to do this is to open up a word document side by side with the spoken-word video. Listen carefully, then press pause, and transcribe the poem word-by-word. Continue until the end of the poem. Once you have all the words precisely transcribed, start to think about how they appear on your page. Does it look like a poem? A list? Something else? You can make the text bigger or smaller, you can change the font, or use italics, bold, etc. You can also keep it fairly straight without using expressive typography. The choice is yours. Upload this to Populi no later than 9:00 am, Thursday, February 4. Questions: csmith@dcad.edu.

Couriers of Hope: Mail Art During the Pandemic

 


Read this review from the Brooklyn-based art blog, Hyperallergic. Take special note of the actual writing. How does it work? How is it structured? We'll talk about this on Thursday, February 4. Maybe I'll put up a question on the discussion board for the first five minutes of class. Consider it a required but ungraded minor assignment. 

PS: I consider Hyperallergic required reading for my own efforts to stay current with issues and debates in the so-called "art world." New content is posted every day, and the editorial focus is wide enough to include formally marginalized voices. I think it's pretty great. You can easily set up a free email notification.

Monday, February 1, 2021

Compare this text to Sylvan Barnet's "A Short Guide to Writing about Art"

 


I'm curious to hear your ideas about this free online text. It covers many of the same subjects as Sylvan Barnet's classic textbook, but it's much shorter and doesn't include a single image. It's all words. 

I've been thinking about moving away from physical textbooks for DCAD Liberal Arts classes. It seems to me that there are now online resources that might be better at delivering this information. What do you think?

FAQ: The Academic Essay

I've been teaching college writing for a very long time, and through these years I've noticed certain enduring issues that students ...